As someone drawn to John Donne’s concept of truth as standing on the top of a ‘huge hill/ Cragged and steep,’ with its implication that all seekers are struggling up different sides of the hill on different paths but all heading in the same direction, it’s no mystery why this article on the Bahá’í Teachings website should appeal to me so strongly. Below is a short extract: for the full post see link.
How many paths are there to God? There are as many paths to God as there are souls on the Earth.
Most people would probably agree that we all forge our own paths to God, as Rumi suggested. Also, most would likely agree that many different religious paths have at least some validity.
But not everyone. Some people definitely disagree, saying that their religion or their particular path is the one and only way to achieve salvation or spirituality or any true enlightenment; and that all other paths to God are false.
Which one of those approaches do you believe in?
If you favor Rumi’s approach, you’re what’s now called a religious pluralist. You may not have ever heard the term or thought about yourself this way, but take a look at these definitions of pluralism to see if they resonate with what you already think and believe:
pluˊralˑism: n. various ethnic, religious, etc. groups existing together in a nation or society
reˑliˊgious pluˊralˑism: n. an approach to faith usually characterized by humility regarding the level of truth and effectiveness of one’s own religion, as well as the goals of respectful dialogue and mutual understanding with other traditions
Lately, philosophers and theologians increasingly group people of faith into three distinct categories of belief: pluralist; exclusivist; and inclusivist.
The British author, Anglican rector and theologian Alan Race first came up with this three-stage concept in 1983. A well-known advocate of interfaith understanding and activities, he wrote:
Religious studies is healing us of our stereotyped views about other religions; the ethical principle of respect in relationships with our neighbours is demanding that we learn from other religions; dialogue opens the door to further ‘critical communion’ with other religions …
So, before we explore this new idea, let’s define what the two other approaches to faith actually mean:
- exclusivist: n. a religious person who believes that only one set of beliefs or practices can ultimately be true or correct, and all others are in error
- inclusivist: n. a religious person who believes that one set of beliefs is absolutely true, but that others are at least partially true
To sum up:
- If you believe your religion is the absolute truth and all others are false, you’re an exclusivist.
- If you believe your religion is the truest, but others also have some truth, you’re an inclusivist.
- If you believe your religion is true but not the exclusive source of truth, and that multiple religious beliefs can and should co-exist in the world, you’re a pluralist.
Which one are you?